# 16. Orthogonal Projections and Their Applications¶

Contents

## 16.1. Overview¶

Orthogonal projection is a cornerstone of vector space methods, with many diverse applications.

These include, but are not limited to,

Least squares projection, also known as linear regression

Conditional expectations for multivariate normal (Gaussian) distributions

Gram–Schmidt orthogonalization

QR decomposition

Orthogonal polynomials

etc

In this lecture we focus on

key ideas

least squares regression

### 16.1.1. Further Reading¶

For background and foundational concepts, see our lecture on linear algebra.

For more proofs and greater theoretical detail, see A Primer in Econometric Theory.

For a complete set of proofs in a general setting, see, for example, [Rom05].

For an advanced treatment of projection in the context of least squares prediction, see this book chapter.

## 16.2. Key Definitions¶

Assume \(x, z \in \mathbb{R}^n\).

Define \(\langle x, z\rangle = \sum_i x_i z_i\).

Recall \(\|x \|^2 = \langle x, x \rangle\).

The **law of cosines** states that \(\langle x, z \rangle = \| x \| \| z \| \cos(\theta)\) where \(\theta\) is the angle between the vectors \(x\) and \(z\).

When \(\langle x, z\rangle = 0\), then \(\cos(\theta) = 0\) and \(x\) and \(z\) are said to be **orthogonal** and we write \(x \perp z\)

For a linear subspace \(S \subset \mathbb{R}^n\), we call \(x \in \mathbb{R}^n\) **orthogonal to** \(S\) if \(x \perp z\) for all \(z \in S\), and write \(x \perp S\)

The **orthogonal complement** of linear subspace \(S \subset \mathbb{R}^n\) is the set \(S^{\perp} := \{x \in \mathbb{R}^n \,:\, x \perp S\}\)

\(S^\perp\) is a linear subspace of \(\mathbb{R}^n\)

To see this, fix \(x, y \in S^{\perp}\) and \(\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{R}\).

Observe that if \(z \in S\), then

Hence \(\alpha x + \beta y \in S^{\perp}\), as was to be shown

A set of vectors \(\{x_1, \ldots, x_k\} \subset \mathbb{R}^n\) is called an **orthogonal set** if \(x_i \perp x_j\) whenever \(i \not= j\).

If \(\{x_1, \ldots, x_k\}\) is an orthogonal set, then the **Pythagorean Law** states that

For example, when \(k=2\), \(x_1 \perp x_2\) implies

## 16.3. The Orthogonal Projection Theorem¶

What vector within a linear subspace of \(\mathbb{R}^n\) best approximates a given vector in \(\mathbb{R}^n\)?

The next theorem provides answers this question.

**Theorem** (OPT) Given \(y \in \mathbb{R}^n\) and linear subspace \(S \subset \mathbb{R}^n\),
there exists a unique solution to the minimization problem

The minimizer \(\hat y\) is the unique vector in \(\mathbb{R}^n\) that satisfies

\(\hat y \in S\)

\(y - \hat y \perp S\)

The vector \(\hat y\) is called the **orthogonal projection** of \(y\) onto \(S\).

The next figure provides some intuition

### 16.3.1. Proof of sufficiency¶

We’ll omit the full proof.

But we will prove sufficiency of the asserted conditions.

To this end, let \(y \in \mathbb{R}^n\) and let \(S\) be a linear subspace of \(\mathbb{R}^n\).

Let \(\hat y\) be a vector in \(\mathbb{R}^n\) such that \(\hat y \in S\) and \(y - \hat y \perp S\).

Let \(z\) be any other point in \(S\) and use the fact that \(S\) is a linear subspace to deduce

Hence \(\| y - z \| \geq \| y - \hat y \|\), which completes the proof.

### 16.3.2. Orthogonal Projection as a Mapping¶

For a linear space \(Y\) and a fixed linear subspace \(S\), we have a functional relationship

By the OPT, this is a well-defined mapping or *operator* from \(\mathbb{R}^n\) to \(\mathbb{R}^n\).

In what follows we denote this operator by a matrix \(P\)

\(P y\) represents the projection \(\hat y\).

This is sometimes expressed as \(\hat E_S y = P y\), where \(\hat E\) denotes a

**wide-sense expectations operator**and the subscript \(S\) indicates that we are projecting \(y\) onto the linear subspace \(S\).

The operator \(P\) is called the **orthogonal projection mapping onto** \(S\)

It is immediate from the OPT that for any \(y \in \mathbb{R}^n\)

\(P y \in S\) and

\(y - P y \perp S\)

From this we can deduce additional useful properties, such as

\(\| y \|^2 = \| P y \|^2 + \| y - P y \|^2\) and

\(\| P y \| \leq \| y \|\)

For example, to prove 1, observe that \(y = P y + y - P y\) and apply the Pythagorean law.

#### 16.3.2.1. Orthogonal Complement¶

Let \(S \subset \mathbb{R}^n\).

The **orthogonal complement** of \(S\) is the linear subspace \(S^{\perp}\) that satisfies
\(x_1 \perp x_2\) for every \(x_1 \in S\) and \(x_2 \in S^{\perp}\).

Let \(Y\) be a linear space with linear subspace \(S\) and its orthogonal complement \(S^{\perp}\).

We write

to indicate that for every \(y \in Y\) there is unique \(x_1 \in S\) and a unique \(x_2 \in S^{\perp}\) such that \(y = x_1 + x_2\).

Moreover, \(x_1 = \hat E_S y\) and \(x_2 = y - \hat E_S y\).

This amounts to another version of the OPT:

**Theorem**. If \(S\) is a linear subspace of \(\mathbb{R}^n\), \(\hat E_S y = P y\) and \(\hat E_{S^{\perp}} y = M y\), then

The next figure illustrates

## 16.4. Orthonormal Basis¶

An orthogonal set of vectors \(O \subset \mathbb{R}^n\) is called an **orthonormal set** if \(\| u \| = 1\) for all \(u \in O\).

Let \(S\) be a linear subspace of \(\mathbb{R}^n\) and let \(O \subset S\).

If \(O\) is orthonormal and \(\mathop{\mathrm{span}} O = S\), then \(O\) is called an **orthonormal basis** of \(S\).

\(O\) is necessarily a basis of \(S\) (being independent by orthogonality and the fact that no element is the zero vector).

One example of an orthonormal set is the canonical basis \(\{e_1, \ldots, e_n\}\) that forms an orthonormal basis of \(\mathbb{R}^n\), where \(e_i\) is the \(i\) th unit vector.

If \(\{u_1, \ldots, u_k\}\) is an orthonormal basis of linear subspace \(S\), then

To see this, observe that since \(x \in \mathop{\mathrm{span}}\{u_1, \ldots, u_k\}\), we can find scalars \(\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_k\) that verify

Taking the inner product with respect to \(u_i\) gives

Combining this result with (16.1) verifies the claim.

### 16.4.1. Projection onto an Orthonormal Basis¶

When the subspace onto which are projecting is orthonormal, computing the projection simplifies:

**Theorem** If \(\{u_1, \ldots, u_k\}\) is an orthonormal basis for \(S\), then

Proof: Fix \(y \in \mathbb{R}^n\) and let \(P y\) be defined as in (16.2).

Clearly, \(P y \in S\).

We claim that \(y - P y \perp S\) also holds.

It sufficies to show that \(y - P y \perp\) any basis vector \(u_i\) (why?).

This is true because

## 16.5. Projection Using Matrix Algebra¶

Let \(S\) be a linear subspace of \(\mathbb{R}^n\) and let \(y \in \mathbb{R}^n\).

We want to compute the matrix \(P\) that verifies

Evidently \(Py\) is a linear function from \(y \in \mathbb{R}^n\) to \(P y \in \mathbb{R}^n\).

This reference is useful https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_map#Matrices.

**Theorem.** Let the columns of \(n \times k\) matrix \(X\) form a basis of \(S\). Then

Proof: Given arbitrary \(y \in \mathbb{R}^n\) and \(P = X (X'X)^{-1} X'\), our claim is that

\(P y \in S\), and

\(y - P y \perp S\)

Claim 1 is true because

An expression of the form \(X a\) is precisely a linear combination of the columns of \(X\), and hence an element of \(S\).

Claim 2 is equivalent to the statement

This is true: If \(b \in \mathbb{R}^K\), then

The proof is now complete.

### 16.5.1. Starting with \(X\)¶

It is common in applications to start with \(n \times k\) matrix \(X\) with linearly independent columns and let

Then the columns of \(X\) form a basis of \(S\).

From the preceding theorem, \(P = X (X' X)^{-1} X'\) projects \(y\) onto \(S\).

In this context, \(P\) is often called the **projection matrix**.

The matrix \(M = I - P\) satisfies \(M y = \hat E_{S^{\perp}} y\) and is sometimes called the

**annihilator matrix**.

### 16.5.2. The Orthonormal Case¶

Suppose that \(U\) is \(n \times k\) with orthonormal columns.

Let \(u_i := \mathop{\mathrm{col}} U_i\) for each \(i\), let \(S := \mathop{\mathrm{span}} U\) and let \(y \in \mathbb{R}^n\).

We know that the projection of \(y\) onto \(S\) is

Since \(U\) has orthonormal columns, we have \(U' U = I\).

Hence

We have recovered our earlier result about projecting onto the span of an orthonormal basis.

### 16.5.3. Application: Overdetermined Systems of Equations¶

Let \(y \in \mathbb{R}^n\) and let \(X\) is \(n \times k\) with linearly independent columns.

Given \(X\) and \(y\), we seek \(b \in \mathbb{R}^k\) satisfying the system of linear equations \(X b = y\).

If \(n > k\) (more equations than unknowns), then \(b\) is said to be **overdetermined**.

Intuitively, we may not be able find a \(b\) that satisfies all \(n\) equations.

The best approach here is to

Accept that an exact solution may not exist

Look instead for an approximate solution

By approximate solution, we mean a \(b \in \mathbb{R}^k\) such that \(X b\) is as close to \(y\) as possible.

The next theorem shows that the solution is well defined and unique.

The proof uses the OPT.

**Theorem** The unique minimizer of \(\| y - X b \|\) over \(b \in \mathbb{R}^K\) is

Proof: Note that

Since \(P y\) is the orthogonal projection onto \(\mathop{\mathrm{span}}(X)\) we have

Because \(Xb \in \mathop{\mathrm{span}}(X)\)

This is what we aimed to show.

## 16.6. Least Squares Regression¶

Let’s apply the theory of orthogonal projection to least squares regression.

This approach provides insights about many geometric properties of linear regression.

We treat only some examples.

### 16.6.1. Squared risk measures¶

Given pairs \((x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^K \times \mathbb{R}\), consider choosing \(f \colon \mathbb{R}^K \to \mathbb{R}\) to minimize
the **risk**

If probabilities and hence \(\mathbb{E}\,\) are unknown, we cannot solve this problem directly.

However, if a sample is available, we can estimate the risk with the **empirical risk**:

Minimizing this expression is called **empirical risk minimization**.

The set \(\mathcal{F}\) is sometimes called the hypothesis space.

The theory of statistical learning tells us that to prevent overfitting we should take the set \(\mathcal{F}\) to be relatively simple.

If we let \(\mathcal{F}\) be the class of linear functions \(1/N\), the problem is

This is the sample **linear least squares problem**.

### 16.6.2. Solution¶

Define the matrices

and

We assume throughout that \(N > K\) and \(X\) is full column rank.

If you work through the algebra, you will be able to verify that \(\| y - X b \|^2 = \sum_{n=1}^N (y_n - b' x_n)^2\).

Since monotone transforms don’t affect minimizers, we have

By our results about overdetermined linear systems of equations, the solution is

Let \(P\) and \(M\) be the projection and annihilator associated with \(X\):

The **vector of fitted values** is

The **vector of residuals** is

Here are some more standard definitions:

The

**total sum of squares**is \(:= \| y \|^2\).The

**sum of squared residuals**is \(:= \| \hat u \|^2\).The

**explained sum of squares**is \(:= \| \hat y \|^2\).

TSS = ESS + SSR.

We can prove this easily using the OPT.

From the OPT we have \(y = \hat y + \hat u\) and \(\hat u \perp \hat y\).

Applying the Pythagorean law completes the proof.

## 16.7. Orthogonalization and Decomposition¶

Let’s return to the connection between linear independence and orthogonality touched on above.

A result of much interest is a famous algorithm for constructing orthonormal sets from linearly independent sets.

The next section gives details.

### 16.7.1. Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization¶

**Theorem** For each linearly independent set \(\{x_1, \ldots, x_k\} \subset \mathbb{R}^n\), there exists an
orthonormal set \(\{u_1, \ldots, u_k\}\) with

The **Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization** procedure constructs an orthogonal set \(\{ u_1, u_2, \ldots, u_n\}\).

One description of this procedure is as follows:

For \(i = 1, \ldots, k\), form \(S_i := \mathop{\mathrm{span}}\{x_1, \ldots, x_i\}\) and \(S_i^{\perp}\)

Set \(v_1 = x_1\)

For \(i \geq 2\) set \(v_i := \hat E_{S_{i-1}^{\perp}} x_i\) and \(u_i := v_i / \| v_i \|\)

The sequence \(u_1, \ldots, u_k\) has the stated properties.

A Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization construction is a key idea behind the Kalman filter described in A First Look at the Kalman filter.

In some exercises below you are asked to implement this algorithm and test it using projection.

### 16.7.2. QR Decomposition¶

The following result uses the preceding algorithm to produce a useful decomposition.

**Theorem** If \(X\) is \(n \times k\) with linearly independent columns, then there exists a factorization \(X = Q R\) where

\(R\) is \(k \times k\), upper triangular, and nonsingular

\(Q\) is \(n \times k\) with orthonormal columns

Proof sketch: Let

\(x_j := \mathop{\mathrm{col}}_j (X)\)

\(\{u_1, \ldots, u_k\}\) be orthonormal with same span as \(\{x_1, \ldots, x_k\}\) (to be constructed using Gram–Schmidt)

\(Q\) be formed from cols \(u_i\)

Since \(x_j \in \mathop{\mathrm{span}}\{u_1, \ldots, u_j\}\), we have

Some rearranging gives \(X = Q R\).

### 16.7.3. Linear Regression via QR Decomposition¶

For matrices \(X\) and \(y\) that overdetermine \(beta\) in the linear equation system \(y = X \beta\), we found the least squares approximator \(\hat \beta = (X' X)^{-1} X' y\).

Using the QR decomposition \(X = Q R\) gives

Numerical routines would in this case use the alternative form \(R \hat \beta = Q' y\) and back substitution.

## 16.8. Exercises¶

### 16.8.1. Exercise 1¶

Show that, for any linear subspace \(S \subset \mathbb{R}^n\), \(S \cap S^{\perp} = \{0\}\).

### 16.8.2. Exercise 2¶

Let \(P = X (X' X)^{-1} X'\) and let \(M = I - P\). Show that \(P\) and \(M\) are both idempotent and symmetric. Can you give any intuition as to why they should be idempotent?

### 16.8.3. Exercise 3¶

Using Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization, produce a linear projection of \(y\) onto the column space of \(X\) and verify this using the projection matrix \(P := X (X' X)^{-1} X'\) and also using QR decomposition, where:

and

## 16.9. Solutions¶

### 16.9.1. Exercise 1¶

If \(x \in S\) and \(x \in S^\perp\), then we have in particular that \(\langle x, x \rangle = 0\). But then \(x = 0\).

### 16.9.2. Exercise 2¶

Symmetry and idempotence of \(M\) and \(P\) can be established using standard rules for matrix algebra. The intuition behind idempotence of \(M\) and \(P\) is that both are orthogonal projections. After a point is projected into a given subspace, applying the projection again makes no difference. (A point inside the subspace is not shifted by orthogonal projection onto that space because it is already the closest point in the subspace to itself).

### 16.9.3. Exercise 3¶

Here’s a function that computes the orthonormal vectors using the GS algorithm given in the lecture.

```
using LinearAlgebra, Statistics
```

```
function gram_schmidt(X)
U = similar(X, Float64) # for robustness
function normalized_orthogonal_projection(b, Z)
# project onto the orthogonal complement of the col span of Z
orthogonal = I - Z * inv(Z'Z) * Z'
projection = orthogonal * b
# normalize
return projection / norm(projection)
end
for col in 1:size(U, 2)
# set up
b = X[:,col] # vector we're going to project
Z = X[:,1:col - 1] # first i-1 columns of X
U[:,col] = normalized_orthogonal_projection(b, Z)
end
return U
end
```

```
gram_schmidt (generic function with 1 method)
```

Here are the arrays we’ll work with

```
y = [1, 3, -3]
X = [1 0; 0 -6; 2 2];
```

First let’s do ordinary projection of \(y\) onto the basis spanned by the columns of \(X\).

```
Py1 = X * inv(X'X) * X' * y
```

```
3-element Vector{Float64}:
-0.5652173913043479
3.2608695652173916
-2.217391304347826
```

Now let’s orthogonalize first, using Gram–Schmidt:

```
U = gram_schmidt(X)
```

```
3×2 Matrix{Float64}:
0.447214 -0.131876
0.0 -0.989071
0.894427 0.065938
```

Now we can project using the orthonormal basis and see if we get the same thing:

```
Py2 = U * U' * y
```

```
3-element Vector{Float64}:
-0.5652173913043478
3.2608695652173916
-2.217391304347826
```

The result is the same. To complete the exercise, we get an orthonormal basis by QR decomposition and project once more.

```
Q, R = qr(X)
Q = Matrix(Q)
```

```
3×2 Matrix{Float64}:
-0.447214 -0.131876
0.0 -0.989071
-0.894427 0.065938
```

```
Py3 = Q * Q' * y
```

```
3-element Vector{Float64}:
-0.5652173913043476
3.2608695652173907
-2.2173913043478257
```

Again, the result is the same.